Peter Johnson Discusses Active Strategies with ETF Report

news image
July 1, 2019 | Wealth Management Topics, News & Updates, Market Commentary Letters
  • Peter A. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager

Passively managed funds may garner half of the U.S. equity fund market share by the end of 2019. Despite the growing popularity of passive funds, many financial advisors still prefer active management strategies, particularly due to the advantages it can offer their high net worth and retired clients. ETF Report recently spoke with Ashfield Capital Partners Chief Executive Officer Peter Johnson about the advantages of active strategies over passive ETFs.

The primary reason financial advisors may favor an active strategy over passive comes back to client needs. While ETFs have daily transparency, Johnson, whose firm prefers picking growth-oriented stocks over a market cycle to outperform benchmarks, says this high net worth clients like knowing what they’re holding and the specific reason why.

Furthermore, he says an active strategy allows them to control the risk/reward characteristics of a portfolio much more easily, giving them the ability to customize it around each unique client’s goals and objectives. This is especially favorable for clients that aim for socially responsible investments.

“Clients like to know they don’t own a tobacco stock, or that they own environmentally [friendly] stocks if they have an emphasis in their portfolio around causes and beliefs they have,” explains Johnson.

Another benefit of utilizing active strategies, according to Johnson, is their ability to take advantage of market dislocations or overreaction to near-term trends in a manner that passive ETFs cannot. He says the amount of capital that is going into passive investing is actually “creating some opportunities for arbitrage,” citing both retail stocks and healthcare as examples.

“There’ve been opportunities to own shares in businesses that are going to perform well in the long term, but in the near term, they’re undervalued, in our estimation.”

 Read the entire article in ETF Report’s July 2019 issue or click here.  

 

This summary is designed to highlight various market and economic information and is not intended to interpret laws or regulations. This  has been prepared solely for informational purposes, based upon information generally available to the public from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty representation, express or implied, has been made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein and is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security or to participate in any trading strategy. If any offer of securities is made, it will be pursuant to a confidential offering memorandum, an investment management agreement or other offering materials, which contains material information not contained herein and which supersedes this information in its entirety. This summary is not designed to be a comprehensive analysis of any topic discussed herein and should not be relied upon as the only source of information. Additionally, this summary is not intended to represent advice or a recommendation of any kind, as it does not consider the specific investment objectives, financial situation, applicable risk factors, and/or particular needs of any individual client or investor and should not be relied upon as the basis for investment decisions. Additional information is available upon request.